8610NEWS
2021年10月25日 星期一 所有新闻
地区   
中国新闻美国新闻日本新闻乌克兰新闻俄罗斯新闻欧洲新闻英国新闻台湾新闻德国新闻韩国新闻香港新闻以色列新闻印度新闻法国新闻加拿大新闻阿富汗新闻澳大利亚新闻伊朗新闻朝鲜新闻意大利新闻土耳其新闻新加坡新闻西班牙新闻印尼新闻马来西亚新闻泰国新闻亚洲新闻巴西新闻加沙新闻菲律宾新闻波兰新闻缅甸新闻瑞典新闻非洲新闻巴基斯坦新闻越南新闻白俄罗斯新闻荷兰新闻立陶宛新闻芬兰新闻新西兰新闻希腊新闻墨西哥新闻沙特阿拉伯新闻奥地利新闻巴勒斯坦新闻瑞士新闻斯里兰卡新闻加州新闻苏丹新闻丹麦新闻海地新闻伊拉克新闻柬埔寨新闻阿根廷新闻马里新闻埃及新闻比利时新闻匈牙利新闻卡塔尔新闻捷克新闻爱尔兰新闻秘鲁新闻北美新闻黎巴嫩新闻古巴新闻塞尔维亚新闻葡萄牙新闻哥伦比亚新闻孟加拉新闻委内瑞拉新闻北极新闻维也纳新闻尼日利亚新闻尼泊尔新闻罗马尼亚新闻利比亚新闻南极新闻埃塞俄比亚新闻亚美尼亚新闻刚果新闻保加利亚新闻澳洲新闻乌干达新闻耶路撒冷新闻阿尔及利亚新闻索马里新闻突尼斯新闻肯尼亚新闻马尔代夫新闻巴拿马新闻迪拜新闻危地马拉新闻乌兹别克斯坦新闻奧地利新闻马耳他新闻巴塞罗那新闻马达加斯加新闻福岛新闻斯威士兰新闻毛里求斯新闻
立場新聞
  ⁄  
时事
  ⁄  
2021.10.25
Court convicts man of inciting secession in Hong Kong’s second security trialHong Kong courts made their second conviction under national security laws on Monday, ruling that a man incited secession by using protest slogans in public.The defendant Ma Chun-man, 30, was convicted in District Court over repeated non-violent acts of chanting slogans, displaying placards and speaking publicly in support of Hong Kong independence last year.Ma “continuously and unreservedly” incited others to do what was prohibited under the national security law, using slogans such as “Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times”, “One nation, one Hong Kong” and “Hong Kong independence, the only way out”, District Judge Stanley Chan ruled.“The defendant’s words were not empty talk, but a sincere and heartfelt expression of his beliefs and feelings,” said Chan, who is among a list of judges hand-picked by Hong Kong’s leader to oversee national security cases.Ma was on trial for what he said in 20 incidents between August 15 and November 22 last year. His case involved no violence, unlike Hong Kong’s previous national security trial, which wrapped up in July with the defendant, Tong Ying-kit, also found guilty of inciting secession, on top of terrorism for riding his motorcycle into a group of policemen. Early this month, defence lawyers for Ma argued that their client was only trying to test the national security law to show free speech was still protected. He did not seriously intend to incite others to commit secession and had no concrete plan to bring about Hong Kong independence, they added.Chan rejected that argument as “self-serving” and not in accordance with the facts, adding that he did not understand why Ma would need to test the law in order to prove anything.“The defendant emphasised and relied on the rights guaranteed by the Basic Law, but clearly ignored the major principle enshrined in Basic Law Article 1, namely that Hong Kong is an inalienable part of the People’s Republic of China,” the judge said.Ma advocated his beliefs like a “record player” on multiple occasions and was not acting on the spur of the moment, Chan said. It was legally irrelevant whether other people were successfully incited by the defendant, he added.Dressed in an oversized grey sweater, Ma nodded to his supporters as he was led away after the verdict. He had pleaded not guilty at the start of the trial but did not personally testify.The judge will hear mitigation arguments on November 11. The offence of inciting secession carries a jail term of up to 10 years, but prison sentences are capped at seven years at the District Court.Ma used to be a regular presence at protests, and was nicknamed “Captain America 2.0” due to his choice of outfit. His lawyers previously said in court that his pro-independence chants were usually ignored and he had attracted no followers. Hong Kong police have arrested more than 150 people under the national security law since Beijing put it into effect in June last year. Around half of those people — including former lawmakers, activists, journalists and students — have been formally charged.By Holmes Chan。